<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Between Stations &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betweenstations.com/category/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betweenstations.com</link>
	<description>perpetual motion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mythology of Sponsored WordPress Templates</title>
		<link>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/20/mythology-of-sponsored-wordpress-templates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/20/mythology-of-sponsored-wordpress-templates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dunce hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowflakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/20/mythology-of-sponsored-wordpress-templates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don't believe most WordPress sponsored templates are ranking rockets for the sponsors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WordPress Themes site did a massive housecleaning of sponsored themes the other day. Some of the users of WordPress are happy, some unhappy. Some theme designers are happy, some unhappy. </p>
<p>The basics of the situation is that many of the themes with sponsored links on the WordPress site got nuked. Most theme owners claim there was little notice to get themes updated and into compliance with new policies. Others claim that even themes that complied with new policies got nuked.</p>
<p>Reading some of the justifications from some of those happy about affairs shows quite a bit about myths surrounding the idea of inbound links.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a number of people claim that when you use a sponsored template, with links to the sponsor in the footer, you are &#8216;giving away your PageRank to this sponsor!&#8217; </p>
<p>I really see several issues with that assertion: </p>
<ol>
<li>Most blogs don&#8217;t have much in the way of PageRank to &#8216;give away.&#8217;</li>
<li>Those that DO tend to create custom designs, or know enough about branding to want to avoid heavily spammy sponsored links.</li>
<li>Most of the themes I&#8217;ve seen that have 3-4 sponsored links look really bad. Ugly = not likely to be downloaded.</li>
<li>Providing a few outbound links on ANY site isn&#8217;t going to trash your own ability to rank. It&#8217;s all a matter of proportion.</li>
</ol>
<p>I honestly doubt all that many sponsors of the spammy-class of sponsored themes (ie, themes with 4-5 outlinks on it) see a lot of rank help from the activity. It doesn&#8217;t fall into the same class in my mind as the people who comment-spam blogs on Bob Dole drugs, but it&#8217;s not altogether dissimilar. </p>
<p>The people who know least about sponsors and themes and etc. most likely use hosted solutions and don&#8217;t know how to download themes anyway. Those people also likely have the lowest PageRank, anyway.</p>
<p>Those who know at some level that all the footer links at least look bad, might be spammy, and might be intended as SEO (but kind of fall into <a href="http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/10/black-hat-seo-vs-dunce-cap-seo/">Dunce Hat SEO</a> in my book) are the people less likely to have downloaded these themes.</p>
<p>Those who are pretty sure, if nothing else, that the spammy footer links are ugly, and who have high-traffic blogs, are likely also the ones who get some customization done and don&#8217;t need sponsored links anyway. And those are the blog owners who could actually <em>help</em> a sponsor.</p>
<p>(And that&#8217;s before even calling into question if the links count for much anyway. Footer links are the dead real estate and code zone of a page, and are typically easy enough to discount in an algorithim the way most page code lays out. But I won&#8217;t even go there right now.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/20/mythology-of-sponsored-wordpress-templates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash: It&#8217;s Not Just Search</title>
		<link>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/05/its-not-just-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/05/its-not-just-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/05/its-not-just-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Google Webmaster Blog has a post about uses of Flash in Web pages. Naturally, as one might expect from Google, they focus on the ability of Googlebot or other spiders to &#8217;see&#8217; Flash.</p>
<p>Nothing&#8217;s wrong with this, mind you. Flash navigation is bad and needs to not exist.</p>
<p>But there are plenty of good reasons to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Google Webmaster Blog has a post about <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/best-uses-of-flash.html">uses of Flash in Web pages</a>. Naturally, as one might expect from Google, they focus on the ability of Googlebot or other spiders to &#8217;see&#8217; Flash.</p>
<p>Nothing&#8217;s wrong with this, mind you. Flash navigation is bad and needs to not exist.</p>
<p>But there are plenty of good reasons to use Flash. For instance, while it may not be spiderable, I know two sites where Flash &#8216;product builders&#8217; are key drivers for conversion. Timbuk2, who make really great bicycle bags (and who&#8217;ve branched off into other bags too), have a great <a href="http://www.timbuk2.com/tb2/retail/bagbuilder.htm">bag configurator tool</a> that allows you to build your custom bag, see it, share it, and buy it. (I totally recommend their laptop bag, by the way.)</p>
<p>Similarly, Orbea&#8217;s USA site has a lot of Flash. But, they&#8217;re a brand play first and foremost. They are bikes yearned for by fanboys (and fangirls, hi), and aren&#8217;t going to be a primary (or tertiary, or billionary) choice for a casual shopper looking for help with bike selection on the Internet. Their <a href="http://www.orbea-usa.com/">bike builder</a> tool is teh swanky. And that&#8217;s not a site that&#8217;s going to need lots of &#8216;how to choose components,&#8217; since, again: the audience. We know what we like, and it&#8217;s shiny, light, and high-tech. Er, did I just say we? Anyway, a few runs through a configurator, then the next stop is a local shop who can help you fit and order a nice bit of carbon fiber with Italian componentry&#8230;</p>
<p>er, I digress. Again.</p>
<p>Flash can be a good part of a user experience. Not every site needs to live and die by spiderability. Should Flash be surrounded by spiderable goodness? Sure. Should a site owner decry Flash because it&#8217;s not 100% full of SEO goodness? Not if by adding Flash they can get people to drop some change.</p>
<p>(PS: Santa, all I really want for Christmas is Diva with a full Campy Chorus gruppo. I promise to be good.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/07/05/its-not-just-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
