<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Between Stations &#187; paul jahn is funk king of minneapolis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betweenstations.com/category/paul-jahn-is-funk-king-of-minneapolis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betweenstations.com</link>
	<description>perpetual motion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reliability of Online Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/06/13/reliability-of-online-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/06/13/reliability-of-online-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul jahn is funk king of minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/06/13/reliability-of-online-reviews/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This one&#8217;s for the Funk King of Minneapolis, Paul Jahn.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Salon blog post today on the reliability of online reviews. Here&#8217;s a choice bit:</p>
<p>Online ratings are beset by one main flaw, something pollsters call &#8220;response bias.&#8221; Because people are more likely to rate products that have moved them in some way &#8212; either positively [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one&#8217;s for the <a href="http://localmn.wordpress.com">Funk King of Minneapolis</a>, Paul Jahn.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Salon blog post today on the <a href="http://machinist.salon.com/feature/2007/06/13/user_reviews/">reliability of online reviews</a>. Here&#8217;s a choice bit:</p>
<blockquote><p>Online ratings are beset by one main flaw, something pollsters call &#8220;response bias.&#8221; Because people are more likely to rate products that have moved them in some way &#8212; either positively or negatively &#8212; ratings for most items brim with extreme opinions. On Yelp everyone is above average; company CEO Jeremy Stoppelman told me that 85 percent of local businesses on the site get a three-star or better average rating.</p></blockquote>
<p>The article is pretty good, so I won&#8217;t rehash it here. One thing that notably <em>isn&#8217;t</em> mentioned is &#8216;business owners posting wretchedly fake reviews in some mad faux-SEO urge.&#8217; I&#8217;ve seen some awful, awful fake reviews &#8212; no real human writes like these reviews, or would say these things about a business such as that reviewed.</p>
<p>The visual range depictions discussed in this article won&#8217;t do much about those written reviews, although they&#8217;ll show the bias in the starred reviews a little more strongly. On the other hand, Paul and I have discussed that if a reasonable person found these fake reviews, they&#8217;d make a sane reader <em>less likely</em> to go to a business. Even though there&#8217;s massive response bias in even real reviews, at least they&#8217;re real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/06/13/reliability-of-online-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Jahn: Still Funk King of Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/20/paul-jahn-still-funk-king-of-minneapolis-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/20/paul-jahn-still-funk-king-of-minneapolis-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul jahn is funk king of minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/20/paul-jahn-still-funk-king-of-minneapolis-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Jahn is funk king of Minneapolis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is explicitly in honor of, and the fault of, <a href="http://localmn.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/user-generated-wired-magazine-cover/">Paul Jahn, Funk King of Minneapolis</a>.</p>
<p><center><a href='http://www.betweenstations.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/pauljahn.jpg' title='Paul Jahn is Funk King of Minneapolis'><img src='http://www.betweenstations.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/pauljahn.thumbnail.jpg' alt='Paul Jahn is Funk King of Minneapolis' /></a></center></p>
<p>Paul says he hates me. I&#8217;m ok with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/20/paul-jahn-still-funk-king-of-minneapolis-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Reasons Why I Blog (hi paulie)</title>
		<link>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/13/5-reasons-why-i-blog-hi-paulie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/13/5-reasons-why-i-blog-hi-paulie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul jahn is funk king of minneapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/13/5-reasons-why-i-blog-hi-paulie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul Jahn, who I like to call the Pope of Search Marketing, is playing blog tag on the subject of &#8216;5 reasons why I blog.&#8217;</p>
<p>So.</p>

Because blogs amuse me from a perspective of history. There&#8217;s some extent to which blog comment streams remind me of dial-up text BBSes. And the server this is on generally reminds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Jahn, who I like to call the <a href="http://localmn.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/more-blog-tag-and-five-reasons-why-i-blog/">Pope of Search Marketing</a>, is playing blog tag on the subject of &#8216;5 reasons why I blog.&#8217;</p>
<p>So.</p>
<ol>
<li>Because blogs amuse me from a perspective of history. There&#8217;s some extent to which blog comment streams remind me of dial-up text BBSes. And the server this is on generally reminds me of 300 baud modems, but that&#8217;s another rant for another day&#8230;</li>
<li>Depends on the blog. My cycling blog is mostly in existence to provide context for some other projects I have going on, like mapping and teaching. This one is mostly to occasionally irk some people, like Paul and my current boss and <a href="http://semcertification.wordpress.com">David Temple</a>.</li>
<li>Just in case I lose my job by irking my current boss. (ok, no chance there.)</li>
<li>Because I needed a place to play with Google Analytics where I don&#8217;t care that the TOS in GA means they own the data.</li>
<li>Insomnia. Beats watching cable tv at 2 AM.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/04/13/5-reasons-why-i-blog-hi-paulie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shame From the Past: Talking Urinal Cakes</title>
		<link>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/03/18/shame-from-the-past-talking-urinal-cakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/03/18/shame-from-the-past-talking-urinal-cakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul jahn is funk king of minneapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/03/shame-from-the-past-talking-urinal-cakes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My pal Paul Jahn, Local Search Geek Extraordinaire &#8212; and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune &#8212; have revealed that talking urinal cakes were placed locally to discourage drunk-driving on a very drunk weekend in the Cities (St. Pat&#8217;s and the WCHA Frozen Five will do that).</p>
<p>True fact: I have purchased bathroom advertising in my past, including, ahem, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pal <a href="http://localmn.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/talking-urinal-cakes/">Paul Jahn, Local Search Geek Extraordinaire</a> &#8212; and the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/467/story/1061080.html">Minneapolis Star-Tribune</a> &#8212; have revealed that talking urinal cakes were placed locally to discourage drunk-driving on a very drunk weekend in the Cities (St. Pat&#8217;s and the WCHA Frozen Five will do that).</p>
<p>True fact: I have purchased bathroom advertising in my past, including, ahem, light-up, audio urinal cakes.</p>
<p>This was not a proud moment in my life.</p>
<p>On the plus side, it <em>did</em> give me something entertaining to discuss on blind dates in that period of time. One of the people I told about this stuck around in spite of my part in such shenanigans being revealed over a cheeseburger. He has NOT insisted on a pre-nup that says &#8216;no talking urinal cakes ever,&#8217; but I bet it shows up in the vows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betweenstations.com/2007/03/18/shame-from-the-past-talking-urinal-cakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
